Acoustic Guitar Community

Welcome to the Acoustic Guitar Community.

 I would love to see the whole group kick in their opinion...

Please don't think I'm trying to start an argument here, but I had a couple of interesting conversations yesterday.  We were discussing the merits of solid wood and laminate.  The one fellow (he used to build guitars) mentioned to me that solid wood back and sides contribute more to bragging rights than anything else.  As far as the voice of the instrument is concerned, you just can't hear much difference.  He said that if you played the guitar held out away from your body then it might make a difference, but when you tuck it in to you, most of the vibrations are effectively dampened and the Type and surface of wood makes more difference than whether or not it is a laminate.  So as the day progressed, I ended up at my local luthier who seems to really know his craft and I asked him for his comment.  He agreed that laminate vs. solid in the box and sides makes very little difference and that "bragging rights" was a good description.  He supported his opinion the same way.

Views: 4085

Replies to This Discussion

I have played both types, and honestly think there is probably a difference in clarity of tone depending on the player. My Grand Artist has laminate sides with solid top and back, while my J-200 Gibson is solid all around. The Gibby rings more, but it's designed to do that - it's a jumbo. The parlor guitar has a nice tone and depending on my attack is vibrant and lively, too. I used to own a Gitane D-500, which was laminate sides, and it was pretty thin sounding, though it was designed expressly for gypsy jazz, which leans more towards punctuating the highs for soloing.

Just sayin'...

Good topic! In fact, this was extremely relevant for me when I bought my last guitar. Solid wood was a requirement for me, among other things. However, I ended up with a mostly solid wood guitar...only the sides are laminate. During my research, I learned much of what you already mentioned, that solid wood vs. laminate do not have that substantial of a tone difference (in general). I learned that in order of sound, the most important to least important parts of the guitar are the top, then the back, and finally the sides. Thus, at the very least, the top should be solid wood. Apparently the sides have little to do with the sound, so it'd be very hard to distinguish between solid vs. laminate sides. The back, however, is worthy of debate. Vibration is the name of the game for guitars, and laminate just doesn't vibrate like solid woods do (hence the importance of a solid wood top).

 

For me, a spruce/rosewood combo was requisite, and I settled on a spruce top, solid rosewood back, and laminate rosewood sides. My guitar is loud, projects well, and is boomy as is typical of the spruce/rosewood combo. My sense is if the back were also laminate, the volume might suffer slightly, but the tone may be indistinguishable from solid wood (I don't know this for a fact, though!). That said, as an amateur woodworker, I prefer all solid wood to laminate for pretty much anything...furniture, cabinets, etc, so I'm slightly biased!

Laminate versus Solid: A direct comparison

 

As of a couple of days ago, I'm now in a pretty good situation to report on a direct comparison.

 

I have a Seagull S-6 with sold cedar top and laminate wild cherry back and sides.

 

I now have a Seagull Artist Mosaic with solid cedar top and solid mahogany back and sides.

 

As most of you know, other than the tone woods, these two guitars are almost exactly identical in all respects.

 

The verdict???

 

Honestly, I don't think there is that much difference and what there is could easily be attributed to the sonic properties of Wild Cherry versus Mahogany, more than those of laminate versus solid.

 

I've been alternating playing the S-6 and the Artist side-by-side now since Sunday evening and I love them both.  If I closed my eyes, I'm not sure I could honestly tell which one I had in my hands.

 

BUT ... that much said, it's mainly a perception thing.  I am still a "solid wood snob."  I DO love the idea of having a solid wood guitar.  For some reason, it makes me feel like I own more of an heirloom quality instrument if it's all solid.  And it has nothing in particular to do with the sound ...

 

Hope this helps.

Jud - your S6 is satin finish, and the Artist is high-gloss, yes? IMO, this difference may also impact sound/tone, albeit slightly...
Well, the Artist used to be HG at one time, LOL.  Now, not so much.  but, yes, you make a good point.
More significant IMHO might be the fact that the wood on the Artist has aged and been heavily played for 7 years, while the S-6 is only about 6 months old and even though I've played it every day, it is still "young" ... The Artist is "wide open" while th S-6 is still relatively "tight" ...
Congradulations on the new Artist Jud. They are trimmed out very nicely. I think everybody needs at least 4 guitars, so I think you need a Seagull Folk to round out the heard :) 

David --- I remember you telling me that if I was patient, an Artist would come my way that was priced to sell ... you were right.  I got a nice used high-end Seagull with QII electronics for the cost of a new base straight acoustic Entourage.  Sweet!

 

And, yes, I'm sure I'm not finished yet ... but shhhh .... don't tell anyone around my house, LOL.,

When my Giannini Craviola 12-string comes, I'll have 4 - not counting the Backpacker or the Windaroo - I guess I'm done... ;-)
I recall Jud was interested in a smaller-body guitar awhile ago to assist in developing his fingerstyle skills...or perhaps even a nylon? LaPatrie Hybrid CW? Hmmm...

Never can tell just what might start calling my name.  Rumor has it that 12-strings can suddenly have a certain appeal ;-)

Indeed they can!  Here I was, just minding my own business, doing some research on 12-string guitars for a possible future purchase, and I happened upon something quite unique - the Craviola!  So, I innocently post a link to the guitar on Amazon in a discussion group or two, and an amazing thing happens - the price goes down about $200 in 2 weeks!  The price for the 6-string was about $100 higher than the 12-string when all was said and done.  A man can only take so much...
IMHO, a solid top is the most important thing. If the lamination is done correctly - using actual hardwood rather than pressboard - then a laminate back-and-sides guitar would, FOR MOST OF US, be quite sufficient. You want your manufacturer to be very good at laminating, however. I believe Godin has accomplished this nicely...
However, if one is Steve Howe, Tommy Emmanuel, Peppino D'Agostino, Morgan Finlay, or Jonah Lake (you're welcome, Morgan and Jonah), one probably has the skills to effectively utilize the differences that do exist. IMO, I'm not there yet...
Another aspect to consider is resale value. When Ron was initially interested in an S6, and then the 25th Anniversary became available, potential resale was a consideration. IMHO, I would expect an all-solid-wood instrument to hold its value better over time, whether that is truly justified or not.
My 5th Avenue Kingpin II is all laminated wild cherry, and you wouldn't know. Would I like to own an all-solid-wood hollowbody archtop? You bet - but for thousands of dollars? Not right now...

RSS

Check Out the Latest in Acoustic Guitar

Free e-newsletter!

Sign up for Acoustic Guitar Weekly—the weekly e-mail newsletter that delivers coverage of players and gear, lessons and technique tips, and advice about performing and recording. Get it now!

Badge

Loading…

FOLLOW US!

Be alerted to the latest articles on AcousticGuitar.com, including lessons, CD, guitar, and gear reviews, how-to tips, and player profiles.

© 2014   Created by Acoustic Guitar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service